CRISIS OF REPRESENTATION: INTERPRETATIONS VS CONTEXT

Abstract

The article deals with issues of representation crisis in the researchers discourse in the framework of the search for means of interpreting international circulating ideas in the social and political fields, where “significance gap effects” work towards “refraction” and produce structural factors that reproduce misconceptions. The authors focus on identifying the arguments that play a key role in the representation critique and understanding the phenomenon of “authors with polysemantic and multitude interpretations background”, who often become objects for “guides” annexing interpretations for strategic use in intensely circulating (wide spreading) texts. The authors note that the “significance gap effect” in the international ideas circulation lies not only in the ways of interpretation, but also in the social conditions of the reception field development.