VERBAL MARKERS OF LYING IN THE AMERICAN POLITICAL AREA (ON THE EXAMPLE OF D. TRUMP AND K. HARRIS PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the problem of lying and analysis of speech behavior in American political discourse. Understanding the essence of lie is necessary to detect lie markers in speech. On this issue, the paper presents the points of view of scientists and provides an understanding of this phenomenon applicable to this study. It is argued that the ability to identify any manifestations of lie on the part of the interlocutor can guarantee protection and well-being. The article presents the result of an analysis of authentic linguistic material – replicas of US presidential candidates during their election debates, which are the examples of lie markers. These results serve as proof that the ability to analyze the verbal behavior of the interlocutor allows you to recognize verbal markers of lies. This study reflects 5 types of verbal markers of lies found in the statements of D. Trump and K. Harris. It is assumed that lying in the American political space is aimed at achieving pragmatic goals – persuasion, manipulation, informing, etc.