EVALUABILITY AS A COGNITIVE MECHANISM FOR SHAPING AGRONOMIC DISCOURSE

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the construction of agronomic discourse. It has been revealed that agronomic discourse is created according to a single standard scheme, including a consistent combination of several parts: the formulation and understanding of the problem, a description of the already existing state of affairs (or old knowledge), its assessments indicating unresolved issues, contrasting the already known new knowledge designed to eliminate gaps, predicting the significance of new data and evaluating scientific results. It is found out that all parts of the proposed circuit are connected to each other by inclusion in a single continuously operating evaluation mechanism. It is proved that none of them in its isolation can reflect the mechanism of generation and movement of the evaluative meaning of the entire discourse, since the evaluative meaning consists of semantic intersections both within each part and between them in the discursive space. Evaluability permeates all parts of discourse and becomes a cognitive mechanism for spawning agronomic discourse.