SYNONYMY OF EPONYMOUS TERMS IN BANKING TERMINOLOGY

Abstract

The article substantiates the need to refer to eponymous terms when describing objects, phenomena and processes that make up the content of banking. It is revealed that neither a proper name as an agent, nor the second component of a term as a factitive can, in isolation from each other, cover the objects of reality they describe, and discover their distinctive features and properties. The authors, establishing the need for a dialogical relationship between the proper name and the second component in an eponymous term, come to the conclusion that the very nature of the semantic volume of an eponymous term is determined only on the basis of this relationship. The article substantiates the effectiveness of using the description of the semantic volume of eponymous terms through a variety of synonymic transformations that allow you to detect meaningful features hidden behind the combination of a proper name as an agent with its factitive. It is proved that in order to determine the semantic volume of eponymous terms, it is necessary to take into account the integrity of the concept of the described phenomenon, which is achieved by ordering semantic close terminological units.