No. 5 (90), 2021 · 51–54 · DOI: 10.24412/1991-5497-2021-590-51-54
CASE-METHOD AS A MEANS OF FORMING THE DIDACTIC-METHODOLOGICAL COMPETENCE OF FUTURE TEACHERS OF INFORMATICS IN THE CONDITIONS OF STUDYING IN UNIVERSITY
Abstract
The article is dedicated to a problem of forming didactic-methodical competence of future teachers of informatics based on the use of the case method. The methodological approaches to its solution in the preparation of future teachers of informatics at the university are considered. The dynamics of formation of didactic-methodical competence based on the use of the case-method is reflected in three stages: information-motivating, applied and reflective-design. There are two main groups of cases: educational and methodical. Study cases are divided into educational-profile and educational-didactic. Methodological cases are subdivided into the following types: cases focused on knowledge of the content of the informatics subject area, cases on the ownership of teaching methods, cases on the ownership of organizational forms of training (individual, pair, group, frontal); cases on the use of information technology in teaching computer science. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that substantiation of possibilities of using the case method as a means of forming didactic-methodical competence has been carried out, a classification of cases is proposed, projected at the stages of the formation of didactic-methodological competence, and sets of cases of various types have been developed to support practical training in the disciplines of special and methodological training.
Keywords: case-method, case, case classification, educational cases, methodological cases, forming means, didactic-methodical competence, teacher of informatics.
Full text in Russian.
How to cite
Smykovskaya T.K., Favorskaya E.A. CASE-METHOD AS A MEANS OF FORMING THE DIDACTIC-METHODOLOGICAL COMPETENCE OF FUTURE TEACHERS OF INFORMATICS IN THE CONDITIONS OF STUDYING IN UNIVERSITY. The World of Science, Culture and Education. 2021. No. 5 (90). 51–54. DOI: 10.24412/1991-5497-2021-590-51-54