FRAUDULENT DISCOURSE (PERLOCATIVE EFFECT)

Abstract

The article focuses on fraudulent discourse, explores the texts of the literal content of phonograms. The work is done with the use of materials of criminal cases initiated under the article fraud of Article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The article highlights the locative, illocutionary and perlocutionary components of a communicative act in fraudulent discourse. This shows how the fraudster uses a certain location to attract attention, has illocutionary intentions that implement manipulation, and ultimately seeks to cause certain perlocation reactions in the victim, such as fear or perseverance, which lead to undesirable actions and losses for the listener, but achieve a communicative goal for the speaker. Examples point to perlocative effects and identify their types such as fear and panic, guilt and responsibility, urgency and haste, as well as trust. It is indicated that the analysis of the perlocative effect helps to better understand and identify potential threats in communication, as well as strengthen manipulation recognition skills.