THE PROBLEM OF BORROWING AND DISTRIBUTION OF TURKISMS IN THE GODOBERINSKY LANGUAGE

Abstract

At all stages of the development of society, the language is continuously connected with the life of people and its material, spiritual, and narva culture, which reflects, first of all, borrowings from related and unrelated languages. Linguistic science is beginning to show interest in the problems of Turkic-Dagestan language contacts. They occupy a special place in the lexical and semantic system of Ando-Caesian non-written languages, including Godoberinsky. Godoberins, despite interlanguage borrowings, managed to preserve their (gibdil1 and mitzi) language in everyday life, family communication and within rural society. The collected field material of the Godoberinsky language, borrowed from the Turkic languages, amounted to more than 116 units, divided into thematic groups: the names of various animals and birds; field farming, gardening and melon growing; household items and household items, food names; names related to human activities, house, structure and building materials, clothing and shoes, natural phenomena and terrain, socio-political life, trade and craft, words denoting people by signs, relationships, concepts of kinship, names of body parts.