DEVELOPMENT OF THE TRANSLATOR’S LEGAL EXPERIENCE IN THE JUDICIAL PROCESS

Abstract

The article analyzes similarities and differences in various procedural codes of interpretation of the term translator, his jurisdiction, requirements for him, his status and responsibility that he bears for a deliberately false translation. The incompetence of the translator can lead to serious consequences, and in order to avoid this, this article offers some solutions. The incommensurability of sanctions for false translation in some codes is also considered, as well as the proposal of a solution to the problem. The procedural codes of the Russian Federation are used as a regulatory framework. The discussion about pluses and minuses of various procedural codes of interpretation of the term translator has a long history. The problem of false translation scientific environment is extremely important. The author examines the topic based on the example of various procedural codes of interpretation in the theory of international relations and legal culture. The author analyzes modern approaches to people contributing to the administration of the justice, considering, along with traditional subjects, such a procedural figure as judicial representative in a civil procedure.