ON THE QUESTION OF COMPARATIVE PHRASEOLOGY

Abstract

The article discusses issues of comparative analysis of phraseological units. New solutions to actual problems of comparative phraseology are proposed. It is noted that in the compared languages there are coincidences in component composition, syntactic structure, internal image and semantics. Therefore, the selection of linguistic units identical in structure and semantics, the definition of a set of methods and techniques for the compared material is valuable. The correctness and objectivity of the conclusions are calculated from the selected research principles, which greatly facilitates the research process. Methods, techniques and approaches of research of national and Russian, national and Romano-Germanic languages are also important. Due to the observance of all this methodology, it is possible to achieve consistency in comparative research on phraseology. The range of phraseology issues should also include such issues as the communicative aspect of phraseology, the identification of universal and specific phenomena in the phraseology of each compared language, the variation and synonymy of phraseological units, systemic diachronic studies, as well as regularities of functioning of phraseological units.